Yesterday Z told me to about Deelishis (of Flavor of Love)
describing being raped when she was 18. Short story: He was 28. She went to visit him. She said
she didn’t want intercourse. But she allowed oral sex. After oral sex, he
insisted on intercourse and forced himself on her. Her husband said she led the
man on. Z was shocked by the husband’s reaction. I wish I was.
I heard so many
similar sentiments over the years when I talk about rape in my classes. Does no always mean no? Of course you would
think that wouldn’t be up for debate but it always is. I remember a student
asking, “Did she say no with bass in her voice or was it a weak no?” Yes, that
was asked by an adult male. Other students have told me that if you don’t want
sex, you should never put yourself in a situation where sex could happen.
I just described Deelishis’ situation to a colleague and he
also said that Deelishis was leading the man on. Legally, he says, she was
raped but she can’t allow oral sex and not expect anything else. He even said that men think about sex
differently. Is it really a gender difference? Or is it that we are using that
as an excuse? If a man can easily hide
behind the “It’s because I am a man” excuse, why would he need to act differently?
No comments:
Post a Comment